Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000: Battle of the Flagship SoCs

Architecture and Process Technology

Feature	Snapdragon 8 Gen 1	MediaTek Dimensity 9000
Architecture	ARMv9	ARMv9
Process Technology	4nm	4nm
CPU Cores	1x Cortex-X2, 3x Cortex-A710, 4x Cortex-A510	1x Cortex-X2, 3x Cortex-A710, 4x Cortex-A510

CPU Performance

The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 benefits from the newer ARMv9 architecture, offering an advantage in single-core performance. However, the Dimensity 9000 closes the gap with its optimized ARMv9 implementation and higher sustained performance.

Benchmark	Snapdragon 8 Gen 1	MediaTek Dimensity 9000
Geekbench 5 Single-Core	1230	1210
Geekbench 5 Multi-Core	3910	3890

GPU Performance

Both SoCs feature powerful mobile GPUs. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 utilizes the Adreno 730 GPU, while the Dimensity 9000 uses the Mali-G710 MC10 GPU.

Benchmark	Snapdragon 8 Gen 1	MediaTek Dimensity 9000
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	2550	2500
GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1	195	188

Memory and Storage

Both SoCs support fast LPDDR5 memory and UFS 3.1 storage. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 offers slightly higher maximum memory bandwidth.

Feature	Snapdragon 8 Gen 1	MediaTek Dimensity 9000
Memory Interface	LPDDR5 up to 3200MHz	LPDDR5X up to 3800MHz
Storage Interface	UFS 3.1	UFS 3.1

Connectivity

Both SoCs offer comprehensive connectivity features, including 5G, Wi-Fi 6E, and Bluetooth 5.3.

Feature	Snapdragon 8 Gen 1	MediaTek Dimensity 9000
5G Modem	Snapdragon X65	MediaTek M80
Wi-Fi	Wi-Fi 6E 802.11ax	Wi-Fi 6E 802.11ax
Bluetooth	Bluetooth 5.3	Bluetooth 5.3

Camera Features

The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 integrates the Qualcomm Spectra ISP, while the Dimensity 9000 uses the MediaTek Imagiq ISP. Both SoCs support advanced camera capabilities, including up to 200MP image capture and 8K video recording.

Feature	Snapdragon 8 Gen 1	MediaTek Dimensity 9000
Image Signal Processor	Qualcomm Spectra ISP	MediaTek Imagiq ISP
Max Camera Resolution	200MP	320MP
Video Recording	8K 30fps	8K 30fps

AI Features

Both SoCs feature dedicated AI engines to enhance various tasks, from image processing to natural language understanding.

Feature	Snapdragon 8 Gen 1	MediaTek Dimensity 9000
AI Engine	Hexagon Tensor Processing Unit	MediaTek APU 5.0
AI Benchmarks	AITuTu benchmark score of 750,000	AITuTu benchmark score of 660,000

Power Efficiency

Both SoCs implement power-saving technologies to optimize battery life. The Dimensity 9000 features a more advanced TSMC 4nm process, potentially leading to improved power efficiency.

Feature	Snapdragon 8 Gen 1	MediaTek Dimensity 9000
Process Technology	4nm	4nm (TSMC)
Power-Saving Features	Kryo Power Saver Technology	Enhanced TSMC 4nm process

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Which SoC is better overall?
A: Both SoCs offer comparable performance in different areas. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 excels in single-core CPU tasks, while the Dimensity 9000 impresses with sustained performance and power efficiency.

Q: Which SoC has the best GPU?
A: Both the Adreno 730 GPU in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and the Mali-G710 MC10 GPU in the Dimensity 9000 offer excellent gaming performance. The difference in benchmarks is minimal.

Q: Which SoC supports faster memory?
A: The Dimensity 9000 supports faster LPDDR5X memory up to 3800MHz, while the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is limited to LPDDR5 up to 3200MHz.

Q: Which SoC is more power efficient?
A: The Dimensity 9000’s advanced TSMC 4nm process potentially offers better power efficiency compared to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1’s 4nm process.

Q: Which SoC is found in the latest smartphones?
A: The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is found in devices like the Samsung Galaxy S22 and Xiaomi 12, while the Dimensity 9000 powers smartphones such as the Oppo Find X5 and OnePlus 10 Pro.

Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Helio G95

Processor Architecture:

• Snapdragon 695: 8-core Kryo 660 (2x A76, 6x A55)
• MediaTek Helio G95: 8-core (2x A76, 6x A55)

Clock Speed:

• Snapdragon 695: Up to 2.2 GHz
• MediaTek Helio G95: Up to 2.05 GHz

GPU:

• Snapdragon 695: Qualcomm Adreno 619
• MediaTek Helio G95: Arm Mali-G76 MC4

Fabrication Process:

• Snapdragon 695: 8nm
• MediaTek Helio G95: 12nm

Key Features:

• Snapdragon 695: 5G connectivity, Snapdragon X51 modem
• MediaTek Helio G95: HyperEngine Gaming Suite, high refresh rate support (up to 120Hz)

Performance:

In benchmarks, the Snapdragon 695 typically offers slightly better performance in single-core and multi-core tests. The MediaTek Helio G95 excels in graphics performance due to its faster Mali-G76 GPU.

Overall:

The Snapdragon 695 provides a more balanced performance with 5G support, while the MediaTek Helio G95 emphasizes gaming capabilities with its fast GPU and high refresh rate support.

Snapdragon 778G vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200

The Snapdragon 778G and MediaTek Dimensity 1200 are two mid-range mobile chipsets that offer comparable performance. However, there are some key differences between the two chips.

CPU

The Snapdragon 778G has an octa-core CPU with four performance cores (Cortex-A78) clocked at up to 2.4 GHz and four efficiency cores (Cortex-A55) clocked at up to 1.9 GHz. The Dimensity 1200 has an octa-core CPU with four performance cores (Cortex-A78) clocked at up to 3.0 GHz and four efficiency cores (Cortex-A55) clocked at up to 2.0 GHz. In terms of raw performance, the Dimensity 1200 has a slight edge over the Snapdragon 778G.

GPU

The Snapdragon 778G has an Adreno 642 GPU, while the Dimensity 1200 has a Mali-G77 MC9 GPU. Both GPUs are capable of providing good gaming performance, but the Mali-G77 MC9 is slightly more powerful than the Adreno 642.

Other Features

The Snapdragon 778G supports 5G connectivity, while the Dimensity 1200 supports both 5G and 4G connectivity. The Snapdragon 778G also has a more advanced image signal processor (ISP), which allows it to capture higher-quality photos and videos.

Conclusion

Overall, the Snapdragon 778G and MediaTek Dimensity 1200 are two comparable mid-range chipsets. However, the Dimensity 1200 has a slight edge in terms of CPU and GPU performance, while the Snapdragon 778G has a more advanced ISP. Ultimately, the best chipset for you will depend on your specific needs and preferences.

Snapdragon 480 vs MediaTek Helio P35: Comparison

The Snapdragon 480 and MediaTek Helio P35 are two entry-level smartphone chipsets that offer similar features and performance.

Key Differences:

• CPU Architecture: The Snapdragon 480 uses an 8nm Kryo 460 octa-core CPU, while the Helio P35 uses a 12nm Cortex-A53 octa-core CPU.
• GPU Performance: The Snapdragon 480 features an Adreno 619 GPU, which offers better graphics performance than the PowerVR GE8320 GPU in the Helio P35.
• Camera Capabilities: The Snapdragon 480 supports triple-lens cameras and 4K video recording, while the Helio P35 is limited to dual-lens cameras and 1080p video recording.
• Connectivity: Both chipsets support dual-SIM 4G LTE, Wi-Fi 5, and Bluetooth 5.0. However, the Snapdragon 480 offers slightly faster download speeds.

Overall:

The Snapdragon 480 offers superior CPU and GPU performance, better camera capabilities, and faster connectivity compared to the MediaTek Helio P35. As a result, it is a better choice for budget-friendly smartphones that prioritize performance and camera quality.

Snapdragon 662 vs MediaTek Dimensity 700

The Snapdragon 662 and MediaTek Dimensity 700 are two mid-range smartphone processors released in 2020. Here is a comparison:

Performance:

• Dimensity 700 has a slight edge in CPU performance with its 2.2GHz octa-core processor.
• Snapdragon 662 excels in GPU performance thanks to its Adreno 610 GPU.

Connectivity:

• Both processors support 5G and dual-SIM connectivity.
• Dimensity 700 offers a slightly faster download speed of up to 2.77Gbps.

Camera Support:

• Dimensity 700 supports up to 64MP single rear camera or dual 16MP front and rear cameras.
• Snapdragon 662 supports up to 192MP single rear camera or 64MP dual rear cameras.

Other Features:

• Dimensity 700 has a dedicated AI accelerator for enhanced AI tasks.
• Snapdragon 662 offers better multimedia playback and audio support.

Conclusion:

The Dimensity 700 offers faster CPU performance and 5G connectivity, while the Snapdragon 662 has a stronger GPU and camera support. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of the user, such as gaming, photography, or overall performance.

Snapdragon 888 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100

The Snapdragon 888 from Qualcomm and the MediaTek Dimensity 1100 are two of the top mobile chipsets in the market today. Both offer flagship-level performance, but there are some key differences between the two.

CPU and GPU
The Snapdragon 888 has a more powerful CPU than the MediaTek Dimensity 1100. It uses a 1+3+4 core configuration with a single Cortex-X1 core, three Cortex-A78 cores, and four Cortex-A55 cores. The Dimensity 1100, on the other hand, uses a 4+4 core configuration with four Cortex-A78 cores and four Cortex-A55 cores.

In terms of GPU, the Snapdragon 888 has a more powerful Adreno 660 GPU than the Dimensity 1100’s Mali-G77 MC9 GPU.

Memory and Storage
Both the Snapdragon 888 and MediaTek Dimensity 1100 support LPDDR5 memory and UFS 3.1 storage. However, the Snapdragon 888 supports higher memory bandwidth than the Dimensity 1100.

Connectivity
The Snapdragon 888 and MediaTek Dimensity 1100 both support 5G connectivity. However, the Snapdragon 888 supports mmWave 5G, which is not supported by the Dimensity 1100.

Other Features
The Snapdragon 888 and MediaTek Dimensity 1100 both support a range of other features, including AI acceleration, imaging processing, and display technologies. However, there are some minor differences in the specific features supported by each chipset.

Overall
The Snapdragon 888 and MediaTek Dimensity 1100 are both powerful mobile chipsets that offer flagship-level performance. However, the Snapdragon 888 has a number of advantages over the Dimensity 1100, including a more powerful CPU and GPU, higher memory bandwidth, and support for mmWave 5G.

Snapdragon 865 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000

CPU:

• Snapdragon 865: 1×3.09GHz Kryo 585, 3×2.42GHz Kryo 585, 4×1.8GHz Kryo 585
• MediaTek Dimensity 1000: 1×2.6GHz Cortex-A77, 3×2.2GHz Cortex-A77, 4×2.0GHz Cortex-A55

GPU:

• Snapdragon 865: Adreno 650
• MediaTek Dimensity 1000: Mali-G77 MC9

Other Features:

• Snapdragon 865: LPDDR5/LPDDR4 support, 5G modem integrated
• MediaTek Dimensity 1000: LPDDR4X support, 5G modem integrated with sub-6 and mmWave capabilities

Benchmarks:

• Geekbench 5: Snapdragon 865 (1103/3491) > MediaTek Dimensity 1000 (784/2829)

Key Differences:

• The Snapdragon 865 offers a faster CPU and GPU, while the MediaTek Dimensity 1000 has better 5G capabilities.
• The Snapdragon 865 supports LPDDR5 memory, while the MediaTek Dimensity 1000 only supports LPDDR4X.
• The Snapdragon 865 is generally considered the more powerful SoC, but the MediaTek Dimensity 1000 offers a more affordable option with comparable performance.

Snapdragon 765G vs MediaTek Dimensity 820

The Snapdragon 765G and MediaTek Dimensity 820 are mid-range mobile processors known for their gaming capabilities. Here is a comparison of their key features:

• CPU: The Snapdragon 765G has eight cores (1x Kryo 475 Prime, 1x Kryo 475, and 6x Kryo 475) with a maximum clock speed of 2.4 GHz. The MediaTek Dimensity 820 has eight cores (4x Cortex-A76 and 4x Cortex-A55) with a maximum clock speed of 2.6 GHz.

• GPU: The Snapdragon 765G features an Adreno 620 GPU, while the MediaTek Dimensity 820 has a Mali-G57 MC5 GPU.

• Fabrication: Both processors are built on a 7nm process.

• 5G Connectivity: Both the Snapdragon 765G and MediaTek Dimensity 820 support 5G connectivity.

• Other Features: The Snapdragon 765G supports Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.1, and NFC. The MediaTek Dimensity 820 supports Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.1, and NFC.

In terms of performance, the Snapdragon 765G has a slight edge in CPU-intensive tasks due to its higher clock speed and more efficient Kryo cores. However, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 may offer better overall performance in gaming, as it has a more powerful GPU and higher clock speeds.

Ultimately, the choice between the Snapdragon 765G and MediaTek Dimensity 820 depends on the specific needs and priorities of the user.

Snapdragon 750G vs MediaTek Helio G90T

Overview:

The Snapdragon 750G and MediaTek Helio G90T are mid-range mobile chipsets designed for gaming and performance.

CPU:

• Snapdragon 750G: Octa-core (2x Kryo 570 Gold + 6x Kryo 570 Silver)
• MediaTek Helio G90T: Octa-core (2x Cortex-A76 + 6x Cortex-A55)

The Snapdragon 750G has a slight CPU advantage with its higher-clocked Gold cores.

GPU:

• Snapdragon 750G: Adreno 619
• MediaTek Helio G90T: Mali-G76 MC4

The Snapdragon 750G has a more powerful GPU, providing better graphics performance.

Connectivity:

• Snapdragon 750G: 5G (Sub-6 GHz)
• MediaTek Helio G90T: 4G LTE

The Snapdragon 750G supports 5G connectivity, while the MediaTek Helio G90T does not.

Gaming Features:

Both chipsets offer gaming enhancements, including:

• Snapdragon 750G: Game Booster, Adreno Updatable Drivers
• MediaTek Helio G90T: HyperEngine Game Technology

Conclusion:

The Snapdragon 750G offers superior graphics performance, 5G connectivity, and a slightly better CPU. However, the MediaTek Helio G90T is a more affordable option and provides decent gaming performance for its price point.

Snapdragon 732G vs MediaTek Dimensity 720

The Snapdragon 732G and MediaTek Dimensity 720 are two mid-range mobile processors that offer similar performance but have key differences.

Performance:

• The Snapdragon 732G has a slightly faster CPU and higher GPU performance than the Dimensity 720.
• Both processors have octa-core CPUs, but the Snapdragon 732G uses Kryo 470 cores while the Dimensity 720 uses Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores.
• The Snapdragon 732G’s Adreno 618 GPU is more powerful than the Dimensity 720’s Mali-G57 MC3 GPU.

Connectivity:

• The Snapdragon 732G supports Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.1, while the Dimensity 720 supports Wi-Fi 5 and Bluetooth 5.0.
• Both processors support 5G connectivity, but the Snapdragon 732G has a higher maximum download speed of 2.9 Gbps compared to the Dimensity 720’s 2.7 Gbps.

Overall:

• The Snapdragon 732G offers slightly better performance and connectivity than the Dimensity 720.
• However, the Dimensity 720 is a more affordable option and may be sufficient for most users’ needs.